Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[big-yank]

I never said the information in any protected documents would not be helpful to other claimants in other cases. It is just not necessary in the Fairholme suit. And, sorry, but your "intent" necessity requiring thousands of new documents is pointless and diversionary. Hank Paulson was quoted in 2008 as intending to wind down the GSEs. I have posted a link to that report on this board, previously. What more do you need?

And, yes, just to cutoff some of the usual rebuttal, I am aware that Paulson also made conflicting statements. But the intent evidence is already fully present.

I am also somewhat confused by all your effort and energy seemingly devoted to discrediting my views on Fairholme since YOU repeatedly have stated on this board that only the Perry Appeal matters. If Fairholme suddenly has some new value to you, could it be as the document clearing house? Hmmm.

JMHO.