InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 58
Posts 8395
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/15/2009

Re: big-yank post# 357756

Friday, 10/28/2016 1:07:55 PM

Friday, October 28, 2016 1:07:55 PM

Post# of 797383
"Establishing "why" a taking took place is not a requirement to rule on whether a taking either did or did not occur."

As I already told you, intent is a requirement in a Takings claim. While intent is not, "why", it is quite necessary to see the volitional actions taken by the Government to determine what their Intention was.

"I expect the appeal will rule in favor of government because the documents in question have no relevancy to the takings claims that underpin the Fairholme complaint."

Relevancy is a legal term. Please don't use it if you don't know what it means.