InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,469.30
(
0.39%
)
US TECH 100
19,174.00
(
1.14%
)
Dow Jones
39,112.16
(
-0.76%
)
Brent Oil
84.69
(
0.60%
)
Bitcoin
61,600.62
(
-0.33%
)
Post# of 82575
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

gitreal

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 183
Posts 41416
Boards Moderated 5
Alias Born 03/21/2012

gitreal

Member Level

Re: DJPele post# 65734

Thursday, 10/27/2016 1:44:08 PM

Thursday, October 27, 2016 1:44:08 PM

Post# of 82575
No. I was just clarifying that TALK is not the party filing for BK, UMS is.

This goes back to the argument that someone was making that no company running a scam would file for BK, and allow itself to be scrutinized. First of all, I am pretty sure that scams do file for BK, probably quite often. Secondly, in this case, UMS filed for BK, not TALK. It is not TALK's financial records that are going to be exposed for all to see. Instead, it is UMS's records, which show they are an utter failure.

Mining Company Research Board http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=21803

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up