Some key details were lost in translation, however. While naturalized citizens are required to swear an oath that includes their promise to bear arms on behalf of the United States and to perform noncombatant service in the U.S. armed forces when required by law, existing policy already allowed new citizens to obtain waivers to delete or modify portions of the oath that conflicted with their deeply held beliefs or religious tenets (including the bearing of arms or military service). The policy update simply clarified the eligibility requirements for those religiously-based waivers; it didn't change the oath itself: .. http://www.snopes.com/obama-changes-oath-of-allegiance/
available to modify the oath so seems to me even if, for argument sake, if the Quran did forbid as suggested it could be possible to gain a waiver to get around that problem .. i'm totally flying by the seat of my hat here so could easily be flying a nonsense kite.
LOL, if so i know someone will jump on this, so that would be good if that happened, too.
It was Plato who said, “He, O men, is the wisest, who like Socrates, knows that his wisdom is in truth worth nothing”
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.