InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 20
Posts 6406
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/18/2011

Re: None

Thursday, 10/20/2016 12:49:21 PM

Thursday, October 20, 2016 12:49:21 PM

Post# of 52840
If the date of final judgement was September 15, and if they have 30+- days to file the appeal that window has closed. Either C&C is stupid and incompetent, which I doubt, or KK has knowingly provided false information to shareholders in the latest SEC filings, which seems very unwise, or there are important events and information that we know nothing about -- the most logical explanation of why we have heard nothing about the appeal.

It is informative to see a quote from an apparently knowledgeable observer of the issues associated with this case in a recent (September 22, 2016) trade journal article: Something isn't right. uspto review of the so called "withheld info" resulted in another patent. Apparently, the uspto agrees with GS and doesn't believe: 1. the invention was reduced to practice in 2003. 2. that the withheld info was material. 3. that it was deceived. Conclusion: this judge either doesn't understand patent law and the right to testing, or he's on the payroll of the defendant's. Regardless, vindication on appeal looks very strong here.

To add further confusion, Judge Larry McKinney refused to allow evidence/testimony directly from the USPTO which would have refuted his entire legal and logical arguments that were the basis of his decision (October 2014). Then upon further adjudication (just released September 2016) the judge accuses C&C of "inequitable and deceitful conduct". I suspect that C&C went apoplectic -- APE XXXX -- over all of this.