InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 59
Posts 17378
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/10/2004

Re: plaintif2000 post# 23503

Thursday, 08/10/2006 3:27:39 PM

Thursday, August 10, 2006 3:27:39 PM

Post# of 60938
Calling me a liar with no substantiation is par for the course. Shall we just say that you can not recognize the truth? Or shall we continue to ask you if you are paid not to recognize fact and to pump untruths?

The "Grandfathering" that you revere in your posts was part of the first steps of SHO. If you can have someone read the reg to you (slowly), you will find that the action was taken to avoid the need for immediate buy-ins from the old shorts, those that existed prior the effective date of SHO. They have long ago been cleared up. One discussion and confirmed conclusion of the same is here: http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?Message_id=12549791&txt2find=grandfathered

LOL, and your "cert call" is typical in pinkie-land mumbo jumbo. Many CEO's of these POS's have made that request of their shareholders. Diversionary tactics. Try finding more than one out of thousands that ever worked.

With only 8600 shares short on 7/11 TD - 7/14 settlement date (yes it is the total short position. Call NASDAQ yourself.), the thought that cert call short squeeze could be created is a feeble thought. More pablum for the stuckholders?

You are way of base with 100% of you information. Consistently.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.