InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 58
Posts 8395
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/15/2009

Re: big-yank post# 356457

Saturday, 10/15/2016 5:44:35 PM

Saturday, October 15, 2016 5:44:35 PM

Post# of 796980
The problem is that it is a circular argument. Claiming that the payment could not have been made without the NWS, but with the NWS, the companies are not profitable because they cant pay the dividends due to the NWS is well...lets just say it gives my head a logical headache.

The facts are simple:
1. The GSEs have, to date, never failed to make a payment. Wouldas, couldas and shouldas aside, all legal payments required to date have been made.

2. There is no evidence that the payments were used for ACA use.

3. There is no evidence that the GSEs would have been unable to pay without the NWS for one simple reason, they weren't given the chance to. You cant say what would have happened without some precedent of it happening.