The next President will decide the future of the Supreme Court.
Yes. Perhaps, though Republican presidents have named a number of rather "liberal" justices in recent decades. Not on purpose, of course. So what you're saying is that two things are of utmost importance to our nation?
1. Denying women their reproductive rights.
2. Upholding Citizen's United, which ruled that money equals speech. Whatever the constitutional argument, the result is that rich people and entities can buy politicians.
So you subscribe to both?
But let's focus on Trump's "Bill Clinton type" behavior from the past.
You have Trump himself to thank for that. He's been insisting for months that he was going to go after Hillary using Bill as a weapon. Perhaps if he'd shown better sense, what's happening now wouldn't have happened at all.
And as for the Wikileaks stuff, welcome to the world of politics. That's how it works, on both sides. Perhaps I should say all sides. Nothing earthshaking about it. Though I'm sure if someone hacked Trump's campaign, we'd be seeing much juicier material.
Doesn't it bother you that the Russians seem to be trying to influence our election in the hope of seeing their own favorite--Trump--elected?
