QS Energy Inc (QSEP)

[whackywinston]

Smile : thank you for your fulsome response...




I take your point that the SHM will clarify a lot of
issues and that - as an example re KM - the use of the word 'partner' will have huge significance


My take on it is that even if the other clients around world
are not waiting on KM, QS is doing just that - as a recognition that everything on offer to the global list is a product of KM's partnership and weening of the AOT in condensate and in general

Maybe the moot point becomes whether QS would prefer to ignore any
enthusiasm for a 'global' contract or its publication until KM's poll position is acknowledged in a contract ..given that the sharp end - and its massive savings for clients - does belong to KM who would be entitled to expect preferential treatment.

If KM's work leads to a re-structuring of industry finances and of its environmental profile, then I guess the idea of generic industry photographs and happy engineers in hard hats and holding User Manuals etc is something that KM might want to control also -
they should be KM engineers in the photographs, given also that a generic or un-named engineer would be rather unconvincing and unsatisfactory..

..and it looks like the savings are going to be huge ..with
ramifications in every part of the business and its future..

silence it is !