InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 93
Posts 21466
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/07/2011

Re: integral post# 14070

Tuesday, 10/11/2016 12:31:05 PM

Tuesday, October 11, 2016 12:31:05 PM

Post# of 15432
What was the issuers last revenue? $2,000? What did they sell?

That's a good question, since like the usual Microcrap scam, they didn't explicitly say.

Buried in one of their previous filings they claimed they had licensed their prior boondoggle Trans AG (or whatever) at a royalty of 0.75%. Presumably DDCC could fake a trickle through revenue of some small amount.

It's goes back to just basic math vs Microcrap dreams.

The math says the going rate for a generic intermodal shipping container is $10K. What does a 0.75% royalty return? Multiply by 20-30 containers manufactured, and that would give DDCC $2K.

The Microcrap dreams envisions Lopez who owns the Trans boondoogle, receiving a royalty of not 1%, but 99%. Then out of the goodness of his heart giving DDCC 99% of his cut. The latest spin DDCC is deserving of receiving most if not all the (non-existent) royalties paid to Lopez, because DDCC is going to "market" the patent licensing. Only in the world of Microcraps does such contorted dreams exist. And we haven't even added in yet, that DDCC is a competitor to Dry Bulk Shippers. ROTFLMAO!

The Jewel of the Mind is Colored with the Hue of what it Imagines

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.