Monday, October 10, 2016 7:20:32 PM
Playboy Enterprises is being accused in a $12 million lawsuit of a naked attempt to hide commission obligations over Playboy-branded liquor.
The complaint was filed on Monday by Broad Street Licensing Group, which says that in 2012 it came to an exclusive two-year agreement to act as Playboy's exclusive licensing agent for spirits. Thereafter, the plaintiff claims it arranged a deal with VuQo Inc., a Philippines-based company to manufacture Playboy-branded vodka made from coconut nectar. Playboy was to get tens of millions of dollars in minimum guarantees with BSLG extracting a 30 percent commission, according to court papers.
BSLG says it got its promised cut of $2 million in advance payments made in 2012 and 2013, but was informed in July 2014 that the VuQo deal was terminating.
However, Playboy allegedly then made a direct deal with VuQo's lead investor. "Not surprisingly, this 'new' Playboy-branded vodka is identical to the VuQo-manufactured Playboy-branded vodka: the vodka, the bottles, the label — everything is the same," states the complaint.
The plaintiff says that its agreement with Playboy is such that it is entitled to commissions for any deal during the term it acts as exclusive licensing agent, plus one year following termination. "To make matters worse," the complaint continues, "Playboy has also refused to pay BSLG commissions on $800,000 in royalty advances Playboy received in March of 2014 from VuQo, claiming — in a feat of accounting that would make Enron jealous — that these funds were 'returned in the form of a credit to [VuQo's lead investor] toward a future relationship with Playboy.' "
BSLG says "credit or not," it is entitled to commissions, and after challenging Playboy's "sham accounting," it was given the explanation that Playboy "independently" formed a relationship with VuQo's investor.
And so, in a dispute that somewhat mirrors what happens when talent switch talent agents and look to avoid paying commissions to old reps (except this time, vodka stands in as the talent), BSLG asserts breach of contract as well as breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing while praying for damages not less than $12 million. The plaintiff is represented by David Swift at Kinsella Weitzman.
Recent CIRX News
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/20/2023 09:12:01 PM
- Form NT 10-Q - Notification of inability to timely file Form 10-Q or 10-QSB • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/14/2023 06:47:40 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/21/2023 08:14:48 PM
- Form NT 10-Q - Notification of inability to timely file Form 10-Q or 10-QSB • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/14/2023 10:10:13 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM
Avant Technologies to Implement AI-Empowered, Zero Trust Architecture in Its Data Centers • AVAI • Apr 29, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Reports an Over 50 Percent Increase in Sales and Profits in Q1 2024 from Q1 2023 • BANT • Apr 25, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix's Breath Logix Alcohol Device Delivers Positive Impact to Private Monitoring Agency in Montana, USA • BLO • Apr 25, 2024 8:52 AM