InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 9
Posts 729
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/06/2014

Re: falvo post# 208

Friday, 10/07/2016 6:09:39 PM

Friday, October 07, 2016 6:09:39 PM

Post# of 927
Well, maybe. The QPWR CEO, Christopher Nelson, has spent years being confident the Cyclone waste heat engine was going into commercial production "within six months". Didn't matter what year it was, production was always six months away. In 2013 Nelson predicted the Lancaster Ohio facility was going to be building 1500 engines per month by now: http://www.bizjournals.com/columbus/blog/small-business/2013/09/cyclone-power-setting-up-engine-plant.html

Instead, after creating QPWR and burning through about $6 million, the staff was fired and the lease terminated on the Ohio facility earlier this year.

They sold one system, but never delivered it. They may never have even started building it. They haven't said one way or the other.

QPWR on June 30 had current assets of $12,255 against current liabilities of $1,983,814. They have no revenues, other than selling stock. They have no assests they could sell for cash. Currently they have no business at all. It's hard to see how they will raise enough cash to keep out of bankruptcy, let alone the full purchase price of ERTH.

Wayne King may be anxious to close the deal, but what can QPWR offer other than rapidly-diluting QPWR stock?

If ERTH is capable of generating enough cashflow to keep QPWR in business, why aren't other buyers lining up with cash in hand?

Why aren't solvent microcaps bidding on ERTH if making them public will be a pot of gold?

On page 33 of the last 10Q they described being in default on two senior securities, and the total plan for recovery is to renegotiate payment terms. Not much of a business model.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent QSAM News