InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 25
Posts 1366
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/11/2012

Re: big-yank post# 355516

Friday, 10/07/2016 9:56:49 AM

Friday, October 07, 2016 9:56:49 AM

Post# of 796371
So I as an auditor do not have a role in judging 50 billion in credit loss provisions for 2009 (just Fannie alone!), and yet I am supposed to judge whether the financial statements fairly represent the actual net worth and profit in a year.
That's by far the largest expense item for the gse's in year, and yet no duty to examine the adequacy. It leads to nonsense. Why do an audit at all under those conditions? Material?! 50 billion!