InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 20
Posts 6407
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/18/2011

Re: Dutch1 post# 43171

Friday, 10/07/2016 9:44:34 AM

Friday, October 07, 2016 9:44:34 AM

Post# of 52849
ONE judge ruled against C&C and GERS based on (according to the USPTO) faulty interpretation of patent law. The district judges are "jack of all trades" with no specific knowledge of this complex cannon. The Federal District Court is expert in this area; not only do the judges (a panel will hear the appeal) have specific judicial experience in IP litigation, their staff/clerks are highly trained IP attorneys. Based on every thing I have read (and posted here with links) yes, I do expect GERS to win this appeal.

Does that mean KK is a winner -- NO!!! I do not trust his management skills (is that an oxymoron?). That said, the amount of publicity this reversal would receive in the alternative energy industry and legal literature, the potential huge (for a sub penny stock) amount of damages awarded to be considered revenue for GERS, and the revenue implications for the then validated patents will cause a stampede to buy this stock -- before any one figures out the implications of KK being at the helm. The amount of shares in play (OS) will likely not matter (therefore another R/S is not an issue) -- take a look at what happened to GNBT in an almost identical scenario about 10 years ago.

Any one riding this bonanza into the horizon would be nuts! The delays in collection of the award could be extensive, and KK, well KK would have no idea what to do with it. Only one thing is certain, the common shareholders would not likely benefit. Thus, my play, and only one idiot's view -- play the appeal and the hoopla surrounding it. I intend to be in attendance at the oral arguments in DC, if the body language of the appellate panel is right I will have my laptop ready and Scottrade loaded.