Wednesday, October 05, 2016 1:48:26 PM
The part I just can't quite fathom is her determination that the plaintiff's "need to know" outweighs any need for protection because the information would be otherwise unavailable (my interpretation, not her words). That Black Rock stuff was in 2008 in the midst of a global financial crisis. How valuable would any projections from 2008 be to an Amendment 3 decision, 3+ years later? There obviously were later projections that are far more relevant to Fairholme's complaint which has little-to-nothing to do with the original 2008 conservatorship.
And,sure,I've read many conspiracy theories that claim the whole Fannie/Freddie enchilada spans pre-conservatorship into the sweep timelines in some master plot to benefit big banks/big donors. I've read them. I think they are all bunk. One of the things I really hope comes out of all these documents is some definitive end to such dialog. It's as boring as all the Obama Birther crap.
JMHO.
Mass Megawatts Announces $220,500 Debt Cancellation Agreement to Improve Financing and Sales of a New Product to be Announced on July 11 • MMMW • Jun 28, 2024 7:30 AM
VAYK Exited Caribbean Investments for $320,000 Profit • VAYK • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Successful Flotation Cell Test at Bishop Gold Mill, Inyo County, California • NBRI • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM
Branded Legacy, Inc. and Hemp Emu Announce Strategic Partnership to Enhance CBD Product Manufacturing • BLEG • Jun 27, 2024 8:30 AM
POET Wins "Best Optical AI Solution" in 2024 AI Breakthrough Awards Program • POET • Jun 26, 2024 10:09 AM
HealthLynked Promotes Bill Crupi to Chief Operating Officer • HLYK • Jun 26, 2024 8:00 AM