Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[big-yank]

Sammons does not appear to be an attorney, but rather is representing himself, at least based on my interpretation of "pro se" which he indicates in his letter to the court. Sammons does make one odd inference to Cede in a footnote in his text.

It is all very strange. I am wondering if maybe he is a fund holder in FAIRX or Perry and expressing his interests in shares of FNMA owned by them in his fund investment? This is not an action of the government as I contemplate the remaining options.

Maybe just another frustrated investor like many of us.

JMHO.