InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 51
Posts 13754
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/12/2008

Re: emdyal post# 318015

Friday, 09/30/2016 7:49:30 PM

Friday, September 30, 2016 7:49:30 PM

Post# of 361154
Issuing toxic debt resulting in billions of shares issued while hiding the terms of that debt for months poisoned the market.

Telling us that they had a 2 million receivable from the IRS when they had already lost in Tax Court and actually owed 2 million instead poisoned the market.

Losing 5 million to the Stanford scam poisoned the market.

Having infrequent shareholder meetings and BOD votes poisoned the market.

Gagging the transfer agent poisoned the market.

Blowing the rights offering and the AIM listing poisoned the market.

Continuing to issue more toxic debt without disclosing the amount for months poisoned the market.

Exposing these things and discussing them didn't poison the market, it informed the market. And I know a lot of shareholders who are very happy they listened. Every single one of them that listened saved money.

When a newspaper exposes corruption and ineptitude it is not said they poisoned the market. Instead they give them a Pulitzer prize for investigative reporting. Like it or not this situation with ERHC is no different. Don't blame the messenger.