Wednesday, September 28, 2016 6:56:21 AM
From what I previously read if the change of venue was to take place the trial date was to remain the same. It is interesting that they failed to disclose that they agreed to keep the same trial date.
From the emails by Herzog, it appears he put a designated hitter in to file the motion for a change of venue. It is way to connect the dots that Herzog knew about the relationship Cowan had with Cherry Bakeart so like a thief in the night he had Cole submit the motion.
If Herzog was willing to keep the trial date the same if the case was transferred to New Jersey why wouldn't he be able to complete discovery if the case stayed in Florida.
Cowan filed a motion for a change of venue, but until that motion is ruled on nothing changed. I am sure they know the rules.
Rendering a service to a Florida corporation seems to meet the long arm statute and obviously having a relationship with a Florida accounting firm that was not disclosed certainly adjusts the minimum contact review.
A January trial is just within the 18 months stated.
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM