InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 60
Posts 8314
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 10/30/2015

Re: Dragon Lady post# 17632

Sunday, 09/25/2016 10:42:17 PM

Sunday, September 25, 2016 10:42:17 PM

Post# of 106841

Gonna be a tough sell in front of that judge IMO. That attorney Northstar hired is no sluff looks like to me... I get this "gut feeling", this isn't the first time this dude has filed a MOTION FOR RECEIVERSHIP and understands how and why to request and use one....JUST MY OPINION on reading his eloquent and "sharp tongued" writing style, and all in a 12 page "MOTION" to the court. It's pretty compelling to me...but hey.. what the heck do I know, I'm certainly no freaking attorney...but if on a jury...I'd buy his argument for a RECEIVERSHIP as being very valid sounding.



The power play by Miguel just plays into the hands of Northstar. It proves their case to a judge that a receivership is necessary to maintain good faith dealings by management. I wouldn't be surprised if the judge cancels those new options as fraud (just my opinion).