Agreed, the meanings of "you essentially said that GE would accept the status quo" is not the same, nor has any where near the meaning of "GE might be satisfied with their 14.8% position for now." Moreover, attempts to use character assassination or ad hominem attacks to promote a misinterpretation as the more valid interpretation just amplifies the noise.
I don't see the need to allow anyone to express their contempt, and obscure and reduce the clarity of the information Charlie has provided when he's provided valuable and accurate information about our investment interest, Arcam, at what is clearly of considerable cost to him time-wise.
