InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 300
Posts 13009
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/30/2013

Re: Magnum7419 post# 207700

Friday, 09/23/2016 11:41:02 AM

Friday, September 23, 2016 11:41:02 AM

Post# of 290029
Okay, so - theoretically - why would it be that those same issues (which we pointed out years ago) are suddenly relevant when the stock is at .30, but were adamantly pegged as "lies" back when the stock was .80+?

Just curious.

"I'm all in at .80.

$5 by January 2016."