InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 29
Posts 7685
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 04/22/2010

Re: mascale post# 260418

Saturday, 09/17/2016 7:48:40 PM

Saturday, September 17, 2016 7:48:40 PM

Post# of 298910
I'll repeat. The dismissed lawsuit had absolutely nothing to do with the judge ruling on whether the real estate existed. It is simply not true, Read the lawsuit and read the opinion. The judge dismissed the lawsuit based on the fact that the plaintiff could not sue upon the causes of action in which the lawsuit was based. That means that in many cases, only the government can sue on a certain cause of action. A private citizen cannot sue. if you read the defenses motion to dismiss, they don't even address the real estate because the real estate had absolutely nothing to do with the motion to dismiss. If you want to weigh fast Eddie's credibility, note that this company has lost essentially every lawsuit that they've ever been involved in. They lost Tangiers, TCA, MHK, Ribero, Terpenix and others.

On MHK and Ribero, The judgments are at least three years old. Even when fast Eddie had the money to pay off those judgments, he failed to do so.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.