Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Donotunderstand]

And no discovery was needed to address the government's initial motion for dismissal

what were the GOV arguments for dismissal - motion to dismiss

HERA clause saying no court can
Not part of the ?

?

And how without discovery would the plaintiff have overcome this arguments?

And being 100% real - I do not believe the plaintiff lawyers pursued discovery for the sake of other cases

I believe that the plaintiff lawyers pursued discovery as a way to say we need more information to WIN against the GOV motion to dismiss
i.e. they said - Judge you can not grant a motion to dismiss without discover - and bang she agreed - and then there was discovery ---- not done to help any other case but needed by the attorneys for Fairholme to fight the arguments in the motion to dismiss