![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Monday, September 12, 2016 11:58:13 PM
For clarity, Hinds and Jacobs case in Delaware, the plaintiffs request through motion a desire for the case to be moved to another court that provided a more experience judge. Is this dismissal of this motion tied to that motion to move case to another court as a poster implied earlier ? The motion is linked in the GSESlink.com.
Also, the complaint was suppose to be a jury trial. If the certification is necessary in presentation to plaintiffs case, how does the judge assume it is not material based on the outcome of the other dismissed cases.
Secondly, if it is a jury trial, how does the judge have that authority to judge what is or isn't important ? He basically said plaintiffs did not make a convincing argument . Hard to believe Retired Supreme Court Judge MoeRon Steel could be so discredit by a lesser experience judge. But, as you said what is suppose to happen is not happening.
Last, do you think a good probability case going to be a dismissal and case moves to appeal ?
Glidelogic Corp. Announces Revolutionary AI-Generated Content Copyright Protection Solution • GDLG • Jul 26, 2024 12:30 PM
Southern Silver Files NI43-101 Technical Report for its Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment for the Cerro Las Minitas Project • SSV • Jul 25, 2024 8:00 AM
Greenlite Ventures Completes Agreement with No Limit Technology • GRNL • Jul 19, 2024 10:00 AM
VAYK Expects Revenue from First Airbnb Property Starting from August • VAYK • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
North Bay Resources Acquires Mt. Vernon Gold Mine, Sierra County, California, with Assays up to 4.8 oz. Au per Ton • NBRI • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Nightfood Holdings Signs Letter of Intent for All-Stock Acquisition of CarryOutSupplies.com • NGTF • Jul 17, 2024 1:00 PM