InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 62
Posts 28426
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/28/2008

Re: big-yank post# 352063

Friday, 09/09/2016 9:14:06 AM

Friday, September 09, 2016 9:14:06 AM

Post# of 802417
big yank

you noted

Fairholme has failed before Judge Sweeney because it has become a stalking horse for other plaintiffs in other suits looking for proof of claims other than the Fifth Amendment taking


Are you saying that the Judge in the Fairholme case will not try that "complaint" on its merits - but will somehow be moved to decide differently because discovery material has been shared?

I find that strange and maybe outrageous

If true to any degree - might one say in equal fashion that the judge - seeing other judges hem and haw - will rule far more in favor of Fairholme than the merits (in her opinion) deserve?

I find thinking that the discovery material impacts the core complaint decision to be strange and borderline outrageous in its implications