InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 17
Posts 1224
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 06/30/2014

Re: DRG1025 post# 44185

Wednesday, 09/07/2016 12:09:31 PM

Wednesday, September 07, 2016 12:09:31 PM

Post# of 140475
Thanks Captain Obvious.

We have a lot of room to trash that competitor. If any part of the investment marketplace thinks that the former "ALF," now SenHance device is better than SPORT - then it's game on. That's why it's called competition. What do you think Marketing is about? Seeing this "Senhance" should create - on some level more comfort and confidence that SPORT is the next MI robot that will have a significant impact on the marketplace. Why? Because "Senhance" is literally MORE of the same thing that already exists.

I was joking about patient size in the previous post, but..... there's only so much room in the surgical field and the OR. Size DOES matter. Miniaturization will be THE key to the "next generation" of surgical devices. And many existing OR's were not designed for 4 separate, additional mechanical/surgical pedestals.

Further, I'm not saying that you don't have a point - which is harped on innumerable times EVERY day, but it's not entirely the problem. The other side of that coin is.... how TITAN spends it's funding. So I ask sincerely - Do they really need 9 robots? Are or were they taking the shortest route to get to get certification to sell this device anywhere in the world? No.

Regards,
BK