Worlds Inc (WDDD)

[DataStream]

If you had read the filing documents on the MSJ you would have seen that Susman did not believe a certificate of correction (coc) was needed since the reference to the provisional patent application by number and date was included within the formal patent application and continuance applications and that a technical data sheet did not exist at the time of the filings as well as the USPTO's acknowledgement of it's error.

The courts ruling is appealable as has been discussed numerous times on this board

To state that Susman was unaware of the need for a COC is another example of your lack of comprehension of the facts and a stubborn incorrect belief in your interpretation on the law and the course this case has taken.