InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 49
Posts 1301
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/05/2014

Re: Jimmy Joe post# 225982

Sunday, 09/04/2016 4:55:22 PM

Sunday, September 04, 2016 4:55:22 PM

Post# of 410533
That's only true if betting/guessing on any individual flip. Then, the probabilities are unrelated. Regardless of what it landed on last time, is indeed still 50/50 with each flip. But that has zero to do with what I was talking about with figuring probability off the statistics given. That's not how it is calculated in this situation.

Using your example of a coin, a joint probability differs when one makes a statement that they will flip a penny and it will come up heads 3 times in a row. Then it becomes a joint probability, in which case, the odds become multiplicative .5 x .5 x.5 so the odds of the penny coming up heads 3x in a row, if stated as such is 12.5%.

With regard to the erroneous use of statistics based on the logic as applied to the article of moving from 55% pre-rejection, to 44.4% on time 2, that is a joint probability, because now you include two events to determine one dichotomous outcome, accepted or not accepted. In such case, you must exclude the 100% sample, and only use the 45% left in applying the additional 20% that was initially given using a denominator of 100.

Sorry...but your argument is flat out wrong JJ. That's not how statistics and the calculation of probability works.

Maz

"Beware of missing chances; otherwise it may be altogether too late some day" -- Franz Liszt

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent ELTP News