InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 3
Posts 567
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/11/2014

Re: A deleted message

Thursday, 09/01/2016 2:04:35 PM

Thursday, September 01, 2016 2:04:35 PM

Post# of 104535
Negative assumptions? Or critically looking at the market and companies as a whole. It's been how many years now since they've been claiming things?

In 2011 they PR'd that they claimed they'd discovered how to mass-produce dots.

In 2012 they announced "high-brightness" dots.

In 2013 they announced they could make Cd-Free dots (should have put them ahead of everyone at the time) and also that they'd started shipping samples.

In 2014 they again claimed that they could now mass-produce dots, and that they'd shipped samples. They also PR'd that they now had high quantum yield (brightness) dots. Funny, they also PR'd that they expanded lab space.

In 2015 they PR'd that they again were shipping dots.

In 2016 they PR'd that they are entering the "next-phase" of their Cd-free development...even though they were producing them in 2013? They also PR'd about guess what...EXPANDED LAB SPACE.

Notice a trend?

Throughout this whole time they couldn't produce ONE demo film for a trade show? That's not making a negative assumption. That's asking the company to show shareholders a PRODUCT!

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.