InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 426
Posts 25993
Boards Moderated 6
Alias Born 09/26/2009

Re: Liam_S post# 472

Wednesday, 08/31/2016 6:32:21 PM

Wednesday, August 31, 2016 6:32:21 PM

Post# of 516
I assume because the judge hasn't signed it yet. I also think that since there was a distribution that the stock couldn't be cancelled as worthless since there is a "chance" of another distribution (IT WAS CLEARLY STATED THAT NOBODY EXPECTS ADDITIONAL DISTRIBUTIONS BUT THERE IS A CHANCE)

I'm just thinking out loud and have no legal basis for my thoughts.

I can only hope 2016 develops like this chickadee



VA VA VA VOOMMMMMMMMMMM

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.