Tuesday, August 30, 2016 8:46:38 AM
I read it. There isn't much there to go on, and no conclusion can be drawn from the article. It sounds like it is playing around in the same areas and methods as PR3D, but there is no way to tell from that article. SGLB's patents would definitely limit the action-ability that could be incorporated into the EOS system. If they cross SGLB's patents, then I would expect that EOS would have to approach SGLB for obtaining licensing of the tech and paying royalties. It won't be third party inspection for sure.
I look at it as a good sign that sensor based IPQA for the metal AM industry is indeed going to be what is adopted by the industry; right in SGLB's wheelhouse.
And yes I did buy a lot more yesterday. Someone was wondering about why the volume was so high yesterday. I wouldn't consider that high volume in any stretch of the imagination. There are many SGLB investors who themselves alone own considerably more shares than were traded totally yesterday. It was likely just a down day in a very thinly traded stock, spurred by someone selling shares.
All the best,
Silversmith
VAYK Confirms Insider Buying at Open Market • VAYK • Nov 5, 2024 10:40 AM
Rainmaker Worldwide Inc. Announces Strategic Partnership Between Miranda Water Technologies and Fleming College • RAKR • Nov 4, 2024 12:03 PM
North Bay Resources Announces Assays up to 9.5% Copper at Murex Copper Project, British Columbia • NBRI • Nov 4, 2024 9:00 AM
Rainmaker Worldwide Inc. to Assume Direct, Non-Dealer Sales of Miranda Water Technologies in U.S. and Mexico in First Quarter of 2025 • RAKR • Nov 4, 2024 8:31 AM
CBD Life Sciences Inc. (CBDL) Launches High-Demand Mushroom Gummy Line for Targeted Wellness Needs, Tapping into a Booming $20 Billion Market • CBDL • Oct 31, 2024 8:00 AM
Nerds On Site Announces Q1 Growth and New Initiatives for the Remainder of 2024 • NOSUF • Oct 31, 2024 7:01 AM