Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[rekcusdo]

"I beg to differ. There is considerable precedent, obviously including Judge Royce Lamberth's initial ruling. But there also is the subsequent dismissal ruled by Judge Robert W. Pratt in the Continental-Western case filed in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Iowa, Central Division."

"I understand that dismissal was partly on the basis of similarity to Perry and questions of the parent company of C-W being involved in the Perry case, but I specifically refer you to the lengthy commentary from Judge Pratt that confirms the correctness of the Lamberth ruling. This can be found on page 19, footnote #6."

You quite clearly did reference Lamberth as "precedent". You also refer to Pratts reference of Lamberth as "precedent".

You are right that Im dismissing your argument. For one simple reason...ITS INSANE! You are claiming that the appeals court will rely on DIRECT RULINGS in opposition of what they are figuring out the legitimacy of.

I will repeat my original post before we went down this rabbit hole with Alice in Wonderland. There is NO existing precedent for the appellate court to rely on in determination of whether Lamberth is correct or not.