InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 26
Posts 1237
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/30/2015

Re: gogoyears post# 37632

Saturday, 08/27/2016 1:26:38 PM

Saturday, August 27, 2016 1:26:38 PM

Post# of 127559
gogo, nice analysis and I'm hoping for the same, especially if the production costs are less, as you state. I really do think 300,000 may be a conservative number for subscribers though, and here's why. One of the main points that the Comic-Con panel emphasized was that interest in H.P. Lovecraft's works is really only a recent phenomenon and it is growing rapidly. This web series could just be the spark that's needed to expand that interest exponentially. The other plus for us is the comparison with the animated series Jonny Quest. That series, although produced in the 1960's and made into 30 minute episodes, went thru two decades of reruns. Then new episodes were created in 1986. There was even a comic book series based on it produced in the 1990's and talk of movie spinoffs. And check out this latest news dated just last week: http://collider.com/jonny-quest-movie-characters-and-rating-news/

Although MoM and JQ are somewhat like comparing apples with oranges, the interest in the animation style and the Horror/Adventure genre type story line will probably ensure MoM's survival well past the first year of production. If it does well on the web subscription initially, we may see sales to a Pay per view service like Hulu or Amazon. I think that's the direction that Tom originally wanted for the series and that's where the exposure increases dramatically.

The other thing about H.P. Lovecraft is that he was a prolific story writer. If you look at the H.P. Lovecraft webpage at http://www.dagonbytes.com/thelibrary/lovecraft/index.html you'll see a listing of the stories he's written. I count 65 in all. This may be why Tom picked one of his works, Mountains of Madness. There's no shortage of new material to expand the animation. And with the sanction of H.P Lovecraft-Ezine, it's all open to INMG to produce.

I, along with most others, totally slammed Tom for the RS. I still feel like that was totally the wrong move. It was probably a money issue. Who knows, it's water under the bridge now. There are definitely scammers out there on the OTC. But all to often legitimate companies on the OTC with decent ideas or product but not enough financing to carry it through to success resort to reverse splitting to try to fund their projects. Priceline is one company that preformed a reverse split after their stock went from $100 a share to $1 a share. Yes, the RS is typically the death knell for an OTC, but a few survive it. Priceline survived and went on to be a huge success. http://www.fool.com/investing/2016/08/23/priceline-reverse-split-the-biggest-stock-comeback.aspx I think maybe INMG was stuck in that boat for a while. Now that the series is a go from what we can tell, this should get us back up to .05 and beyond. At .05 we will be right back where we were pre-RS. But there will be a difference and that is with the share structure. Whereas there were billions of shares pre-RS, there are now less than 120 million and with the pps at .05, there's room for movement, whereas when it was at .0001, it went no bid many times. That along with this new revenue source should reward us shareholders quite well.