InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 66
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/13/2016

Re: welloff post# 36632

Friday, 08/26/2016 4:08:32 PM

Friday, August 26, 2016 4:08:32 PM

Post# of 40315
LOL. Reading a historical chart is uneducated? A historical chart is fact. I am sorry if some people hate facts that they cannot argue with and stoop to the lowest level of argument - immaturely slamming people. Blaming a bad trading strategy on PR's about projects that did not work out is deflecting from the fact that they probably should not be investing in the stock market at all. If FSNR was a pink sheet company that did not publish audited financial reports then you might have an argument, but FSNR has published them and they have never been sexy.

People that have good experiences - such as the traders that made trades where they bought on the dip and sold on the rebound - will not waste their time blogging about the money they made. LOL. Reviews on Yelp! and Google prove this weighted vocalization by the dissatisfied. The big difference is that the stock market already has a "buyer beware" sign. FSNR was publishing its audited financial statements...and maybe you missed the GOING CONCERN on every single one!!!!!!!!!! That is just an additional "buyer beware" stuff.

You cannot argue with facts. If you played this stock right in the past you made money. THE HISTORICAL CHART SHOWS THIS TO BE FACT! BTW...I love being slammed for being a new person here. People that do that prove my point that facts cannot be argued with so slam me for being new... In the worlds of another "Go FSNR" "Go Dynamis" "Go McGhan" "Go McNulty" LMAO

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.