InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 16
Posts 3125
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 11/09/2006

Re: None

Monday, 08/22/2016 4:32:32 PM

Monday, August 22, 2016 4:32:32 PM

Post# of 18311
Also remember as I said long ago that Intel patent is clearly Intel's not ours HDC fell short in so many means and ways when it came to light. Everyone had blamed HDC Attorney's as being responsible for the patent maintenance etc. My question is simply this and among many other things why did HDC not catch the patent problem when it was developing. Intel change/modified that patent 3 times that I know of and even supersized it! Now if that patent stops HDC dead I have no clue. I mentioned a few years ago if anyone thought that NeoGenomic would try and license the Intel patent but I got no response so who knows?

HDC is TOTALLY responsible to maintain their patents and also kick butt if someone messes with HDC's art work. Who knows what may or may not be holding things up.

Has anyone one that may read this sincerely checked out all the SVM patents that have been granted in the past 4 years. You can even check out Barnhill, remember he has been away from HDC long enough to do it to it in other words who is to say or not if out so called ONCE state of the art patents are just like an old "Model A".
Darn shame if true but what the heck do I know!
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent HDVY News