reads,
<<< ...this will be one of the topics covered in next Wednesday's CC. >>>
You just try to create an artifical expectation for the CC which allows you to further bash afterwards if there is no comment. You try to create you own additional opportunities to bash.
This is a topic brought up by you (and the like) on this board or on other boards and now the company has to address it ? Pure basher tactics. It is your speculation, nothing more, show evidence that such an event will happen ? It is your speculation, nothing else.
Marr has constantly supported Calypte there is no indication that this changes. It is simply your speculation and you better present factual evidence otherwise you are in danger of defaming Marr. Show evidence that Marr will do so.
It is like contending USA could bomb North Korea soon, let us see if Bush will exclude this option in his next speech. And then when Bush is not doing so (why should he, it is absurd) one will say: Oh, he has not excluded it, so it can likely happen I take this as further indication that it will happen. Just further extending this topic on and on.
USA has the ability to nuke North Korea, of course, like Marr could have ways in the future of dominating Calypte's direction but does this prove they will do so ?
<<< it might indicate a "new" positive direction >>>
Just another subtile way to spread the message that the company could be on a wrong direction. The company executes the business plan and the direction is correct. It is nothing more than your speculation that the direction is wrong. How do you know that the plan won't work out in the future ? Provide evidence or a link.
<<< Since Tim Clemensen told one caller that this condition has been "expunged" it would seem that this will be one of the topics covered in next Wednesday's CC. >>>
Just another issue you try to establish as a topic for the CC. It is your topic. It is pure speculation brought up by you. The company never commented on this officially, you are just constructing your topics from selected comments posted somewhere and nowhere. Your plan is to wait out the CC and when there is no comment on it you come up with the next "bad news": The company has not addressed this issue in the CC. You are just trying to build your chain of bad news and unmet duties of the company. The company does not need to address this because it is only your speculation.
<<<Might want to wait for the CC and be sure.>>>
See above. You just try to demonstrate some fair balanced interest. You are sure already that the company will not address it. Just an attempt to look like honestly interested and gain confidence by other people who must read your stuff.
