Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Donotunderstand]

?
a takings or a breach of contract?

I thought the appeals folks said - wrong suit - not a takings but you could have sued FHFA for breach of contract (and there the statute of limitations is gone - their not having so sued)

With us - I thought our plaintiffs in the case before the appeals court - did both - they argues a takings AND they argues a breach of contract

Please comment as I read the summary reports as saying

No takings - no day in court

I read Lamberth as clearly relying on judicial immunity which is totally lacking in the summaries of the appeals court reasoning

So my connect the dot is --- sue for breach of contract (not takings) and you have the right to a trial ---- NOTE that IMO is all that is being requested - not a right or wrong but a quash of the motion to preclude a trial by dismissal under judicial immunity

We get our trial on breach of contract as it was filed - the right court - on time and no judicial immunity ?

??