![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Friday, August 04, 2006 3:54:11 PM
i posted this a few days ago. . . gonna repost
to see if i'm really off the mark. .
is there a conflict here?:
from my own personal readings,
the SEC seems to be saying:
"if a stock is not halted, there should be no restrictions
on buying and selling." (example: buying or selling online)
from reading posts here, the brokers such as Ameritrade seem to be saying:
"we restricted online buying because the stock is too volatile so we have placed it on our suspicious trading list."
if this assessment is correct, it seems the SEC should get in touch with Ameritrade to make sure they are on the same page regarding this stock or any stock. likewise,
if rules have been broken, i would imagine there are already penalties in place regarding the breaking of such rules.
as an interesting side-note, taken from dictionary.com,
definition #4 of volatile is this:
4. Flying or capable of flying; volant.
ECGI Holdings Announces LOI to Acquire Pacific Saddlery to Capitalize on $12.72 Billion Market Potential • ECGI • Jun 13, 2024 9:50 AM
Fifty 1 Labs, Inc. Announces Major Strategic Advancements and Shareholder Updates • CAFI • Jun 13, 2024 8:45 AM
Snakes & Lattes Opens Pop-Up Location at The Wellington Market in Toronto: A New Destination for Fun and Games - Thanks 'The Well', PepsiCo, Indie Pale House & All Sponsors & Partners for Their Commitment & Assistance Throughout The Process • FUNN • Jun 13, 2024 8:18 AM
HealthLynked Introduces Innovative Online Medical Record Request Form Using DocuSign • HLYK • Jun 12, 2024 8:00 AM
Ubiquitech Software Corp (OTC:UBQU) Posts $624,585 Quarterly Revenue - Largest Quarter Since 2018 • UBQU • Jun 11, 2024 10:13 AM
Element79 Gold Corp Files for OTCQB Uplisting, Provides Financial Update • ELEM • Jun 11, 2024 9:25 AM