InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 5082
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/26/2012

Re: None

Friday, 08/19/2016 6:47:22 AM

Friday, August 19, 2016 6:47:22 AM

Post# of 796111
The only part of the Piszel ruling that I see as significant to the various pending shareholder actions is the court's opinion that not getting an expected stock award was not a taking inasmuch as the Freddie hire clearly knew the risks of going there in the midst of a crisis. This hearkens back to Lamberth's earlier observation that investors clearly knew the risks of investing in regulated entities and elected to do so anyway.

So in this sense, I see the Piszel ruling as more aligned with Lamberth than offering some useful breakthrough for Fanniegate plaintiffs, as seems to be suggested by Investors Unite.

JMHO.