Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Donotunderstand]

I read what you wrote - carefully

You note at the end that the court recognizes it is not addressing the Takings at all .....

And the court tossed the case on standing

So from where do you come to --

All of this points VERY clearly that the court supports Lamberth and says that shareholders have no takings right in a government regulated entity such as Freddie Mac.

?

And is there any discussion or inference re breach of contract?

And is there any discussion or inference re HERA and the immunity clause ?

Or are we really back to this court saying that under HERA - FHFA had the right to be conservator and took nothing from this person

?