As you well know, I posted negative information about a company that truely was suspect. I was hounded and attacked and called every name in the book by posters on that board. I posted links to ASC hearings, links to their own websites encouraging people to try them and see how they did not work, links to the case against the principals in criminal court and links to news articles about their trial. Those were factual posts and I avoided making it personal or making personal attacks.
If you notice my posts on this board, they are not cheerleading type posts. I fully acknowledge that ASTN is risky and at a critical juncture. My point is I look for whatever the facts are about a company which ever way they lead.
In conclusion, I would support you 100% IF after reading your posts I felt there was solid evidence to what you are saying, but I have not seen that from you. You have not proven your points, just blasted us with old news, mob news, fraud news, trying to associate any negative thing you can dig up with ASTN when there is no clear connection. IMO you have made slanderous statements against the company and it's CEO. My hope is that ASTN can prove that in court.
Sara
Sara
"I never give them hell. I just tell the truth and they think it's hell." - Harry Truman