Wednesday, August 17, 2016 11:30:36 AM
As far as 1.0 vs. 2.0, I'm not sure there is a difference except with the regulatory filings. Most of the hardware should be in place in 1.0. I was under the impression that the ongoing development was mostly to meet the new Human Factors guidelines, otherwise we would have been filing NLT Q4 2016 (which starts in 6 weeks). But because of the new HF guidelines, the development requires completion. Can someone who works in surgery provide ideas on how different the hardware would need to be in order to be used for multiple additional indications? (Not my area of expertise.) In other words, how much additional development might be needed to transition from a 1.0 to a 2.0 system? The hardware I've seen in videos looked capable of doing a lot of different things.
Even if it required some hardware mods for additional procedures, that could be a freebie thrown in with purchase of the 1.0 system. Worth it to get these in the field and initiate revenue flow, IMO.
Freedom Holdings Corporate Update; Announces Management Has Signed Letter of Intent • FHLD • Jul 3, 2024 9:00 AM
EWRC's 21 Moves Gaming Studios Moves to SONY Pictures Studios and Green Lights Development of a Third Upcoming Game • EWRC • Jul 2, 2024 8:00 AM
BNCM and DELEX Healthcare Group Announce Strategic Merger to Drive Expansion and Growth • BNCM • Jul 2, 2024 7:19 AM
NUBURU Announces Upcoming TV Interview Featuring CEO Brian Knaley on Fox Business, Bloomberg TV, and Newsmax TV as Sponsored Programming • BURU • Jul 1, 2024 1:57 PM
Mass Megawatts Announces $220,500 Debt Cancellation Agreement to Improve Financing and Sales of a New Product to be Announced on July 11 • MMMW • Jun 28, 2024 7:30 AM
VAYK Exited Caribbean Investments for $320,000 Profit • VAYK • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM