Intel Corp (INTC)

[chipguy]

This includes all the results presented for Opteron, as well as some on other platforms. It will be interesting to see what the scores are after they are retested

Zeus had better change their web site. They still claim 3498 on
this benchmark.

http://www.zeus.com/news/articles/030623-001/

Somehow I doubt the new score will be higher.

here are some new submissions that HP has submitted for their new Integrity (Itanium 2) servers.

Hewlett-Packard Company HP Integrity rx2600 Zeus 4.2r2 2 1930
Hewlett-Packard Company HP Integrity rx5670 Zeus 4.2r2 4 3702
Hewlett-Packard Company HP Integrity rx5670 Zeus 4.2r2 2 1914

This is compared to a few new IBM submissions based on 2.8GHz Xeon MP:

IBM eServer xSeries 255 Zeus V4.2r2 4 2110
IBM eServer xSeries 360 Zeus V4.2r2 4 2174

This is even higher than IBM's own Power4 submissions (using 1.45GHz processor):

IBM pSeries 630 Model 6C4 Zeus 4.2r1 4 1988
IBM pSeries 630 Model 6E4 Zeus 4.2r1 4 1988


Thanks for posting the new results. I am suprised POWER4+ isn't
doing better on this, the I2 has nearly twice the throughput per
clock. IBM's deep pipe, 2 cycle ALU latency microarchitecture
seems to have a lot of performance holes. No doubt the 970 will
inherit its quirkiness. We will probably see G5 benchmarks all
over the map - great here, terrible there. I guess Apple will
tell us only about the great ones.