InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 40
Posts 1638
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/12/2014

Re: Drugdoctor post# 103213

Monday, 08/15/2016 11:43:30 AM

Monday, August 15, 2016 11:43:30 AM

Post# of 119915
There will be NO Reverse Split!!! Anybody that says so or thinks so is merely trying to scare others away. It's logical that there will be NO REVERSE SPLIT:

1. Publicly stated in company PR.
2. Stated to many shareholders in email inquiries.
3. No need for a RS.

So let's start with the first 2. Many here will say this is pennyland and CEOs lie. True but the CEOs that lie and have RS are companies with NO product, NO revenue and NO cash. So what do they have to lose by lying? NOTHING!!! If they lie and conduct a RS, there is nothing to sue for.

BETS is different. We have a real company. We have real (and growing) revenue. We have real sponsors. We have real licensing in regulatory gambling board. We have new platform agreement PRed by real and very large software company. We have license possibly underway byu a licensing board. In other words, BETS has MUCH to lose by lying both from regulatory boards AND partners AND from shareholders who would actually have money to go after. So.....the publicly stated NO RS is a big big deal.

And finally there is NO reason for a RS. Most crappy penny companies RS because they have ZERO options, ZERO revenue; however, BETS has a pending finance deal, they have revenue and they are not at the desperate stage to RS. Many of the original investors own shares along with the entire TEAM BETS. They screw shareholders, they screw themselves.

I know this and most on this Board know this. DO NOT BE FOOLED. A RS does not even come close to passing the sniff test for BETS!!! CASE CLOSED!!!

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.