DNA Brands Inc (DNAX)

[Ed the Trader]

"Not sure why you always come to this CEO's defence?"

Why do you assume that anytime something is not how you think it should be, it must be a scam?

There are plenty of other reasons why a plan may legitimately change or even run off the track. Some of those possible reasons are good and some of them are bad. However, most of them are legitimate.

If Adrian wanted to scam shareholders, it is more likely that he would have executed a 1:1,000 reverse split when he first took over last February.

The fact that he decided not to do that is worth some openmindedness. We know that Adrian is not a beverage guy, and we have a pretty good idea that he got taken for a ride (and not in a good way) by Costly and even by the social media company he hired to manage DNA's Twitter account. I am quite sure that he ran into all sorts of unexpected issues when he looked into what it would really take to reboot the energy drink product line.