For ITMN they used HRCT (for ASCEND) or biopsy to confirm IPF though I imagine its less involved then measuring the amount of fibrosis what FGEN is doing. For CAPACITY I think they may have used more biopsy proven. Not sure about what BI did. I think the patient populations are similar too, based on FVC/DLCO at least.
If it were just slowly enrolling here but they moved extremely slow from initial pilot results too. I remember asking about the medarex royalty around the time either right before/after they were acquired and thinking InterMune was 1-2 years ahead of them (As an ITMN long at the time I was too pessimistic I guess ). My hope is that they really have identified characteristics that will lead to optimal results.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.