Tuesday, August 09, 2016 12:03:23 AM
Now..had we been allowed to pay back the loan, like EVERY other bailout company did we would have paid down the 116.1B 2012 we showed an 11.6 profit less an 11.6 payment. 2013 82.5B less the 11.6 left 71B which would have left a balance of 45B and changed the dividend payouts drastically. 2014 we made 20.6 and would have paid 4.5B. Payoff another 16.1B (28.9 balance) 2015 we made 10.3 and would have paid 2.89 and paid off another 7.4B (21.5B Balance) and this year to date we are at 6.7 with a payment owed of 1.2YE would pay another 5+ and still have a balance of 16+-. I get that this is simple math and we would have gained by making payments quarterly and lessened the balance faster. I also understand that the company could have diluted shares to raise capital and paid off earlier potentially in 2013 and saved the 20B that would have been paid in dividends.
Question...what else am I missing??? Other than the fact that this should have never happened in the first place!
FEATURED Music Licensing, Inc. (OTC: SONG) Subsidiary Pro Music Rights Secures Final Judgment of $114,081.30 USD, Demonstrating Strength of Licensing Agreements • May 17, 2024 11:00 AM
Greenlite Ventures Inks Deal to Acquire No Limit Technology • GRNL • May 17, 2024 3:00 PM
VPR Brands (VPRB) Reports First Quarter 2024 Financial Results • VPRB • May 17, 2024 8:04 AM
ILUS Provides a First Quarter Filing Update • ILUS • May 16, 2024 11:26 AM
Cannabix Technologies and Omega Laboratories Inc. enter Strategic Partnership to Commercialize Marijuana Breathalyzer Technology • BLO • May 16, 2024 8:13 AM
Avant Technologies to Revolutionize Data Center Management with Proprietary AI Software Platform • AVAI • May 16, 2024 8:00 AM