InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 30
Posts 4182
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/25/2007

Re: sulaco post# 269073

Wednesday, 07/27/2016 12:06:26 PM

Wednesday, July 27, 2016 12:06:26 PM

Post# of 346177

It was a REVIEW of seeding studies

One study of 663 patients that showed statistically significant evidence of seeding is enough for me.

Why do you thinnk they recommend a vacuum-assist device for biopsies?

Doh!


Some "myth." 663 patients.



It was a retrospective review of a small number of patients who had been subjected to an older type of biopsy technique. That retrospective study gave a barely significant result. However, the work also showed, and the authors concluded that any seeding that occurred was localized and short lived. That contradicts your crying wolf about how all it takes is a single cell to generate systemic metastasis. That makes is very clear that you don't understand how metastases are formed and how hard it is to do so.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent CDMO News