Bigworld, I'm with you when it comes to the Hillamonster, definitely a vile witch, vindictive, corrupt to the core, etc. But her policies will come from the usual Deep State/Wall Street interests, with more Neocon influence on foreign policy than with Obama (who was run mainly by the Trilateral/Brzezinski faction but with growing Neocon influence in the 2nd term).
But as Tarpley has pointed out, the Trilaterals are actually more dangerous than the Neocons because they are obsessed with destabilizing and breaking up Russia, which is armed to the teeth with nuclear weapons. The Neocons on the other hand are focused on relatively smaller and less dangerous targets like Syria and Iran.
Another factor to consider - with the world financial system so fragile, Trump could quickly stumble and bumble into a crisis that will bring down the whole teetering house of cards. Rickards says things are so tenuous and fragile that it wouldn't take much to start the avalanche.
And would the Deep State even allow Trump to take office? More likely he'd have an accident, his private jet would mysteriously crash, etc. Then you have a palace coup situation like the JFK assassination.
It seems that either way we're screwed. With Hillary the long slow death of the Republic continues on schedule toward its wimpering end, and with Trump we go down in flames in a quick burst of chaos. The Deep State has been planning the former, with the SDR system ready to step in, so it might be less disastrous for the average American. With a Trump collapse, we're more likely to see total chaos.
So I guess it boils down to picking your poison, a slow death by arsenic or a quick leap from the top of Trump Towers..
AI
