Thursday, July 21, 2016 10:15:06 PM
JNS’s complaint clearly alleges facts satisfying the first and second of these
elements. Sec. Am. Cplt., ¶¶35(d)-(h). Analysis of the third element begins with the
very first fact alleged in paragraph 35: that “CCGI agreed to pay the legal and other
costs that 350 Green incurred in connection with this suit and with 350 Green’s
dispute with JNS over the APA generally.” Id., ¶35(a). This allegation—which is
based on page F-20 of CCGI’s 10-K and which 350 Green admits is true—suffices
without more to justify piercing the corporate veil in the circumstances of this case.
JNS was forced to persevere through two-plus years of litigation to obtain specific
performance of the APA that it signed with 350 Green, and it faces months if not
years of further litigation to recoup the losses it suffered as a result of 350 Green’s
belated and inadequate performance of that contract, only because CCGI is funding
a defense of this case that 350 Green could or would not fund on its own.
VAYK Confirms Insider Buying at Open Market • VAYK • Nov 5, 2024 10:40 AM
Rainmaker Worldwide Inc. Announces Strategic Partnership Between Miranda Water Technologies and Fleming College • RAKR • Nov 4, 2024 12:03 PM
North Bay Resources Announces Assays up to 9.5% Copper at Murex Copper Project, British Columbia • NBRI • Nov 4, 2024 9:00 AM
Rainmaker Worldwide Inc. to Assume Direct, Non-Dealer Sales of Miranda Water Technologies in U.S. and Mexico in First Quarter of 2025 • RAKR • Nov 4, 2024 8:31 AM
CBD Life Sciences Inc. (CBDL) Launches High-Demand Mushroom Gummy Line for Targeted Wellness Needs, Tapping into a Booming $20 Billion Market • CBDL • Oct 31, 2024 8:00 AM
Nerds On Site Announces Q1 Growth and New Initiatives for the Remainder of 2024 • NOSUF • Oct 31, 2024 7:01 AM